NIL Academy

Oregon’s NIL Evolution Oregon’s NIL landscape is defined by proactive legislative foresight (the Royalty Mandate), divergent institutional strategies between UO and OSU, and permissive high school rules that contrast with…

Indiana is one of the most polarized states in the NIL era. On the college side, Indiana University and Purdue are restructuring budgets and donor models around the House v.…

Arizona has emerged as a key battleground in the NIL revolution. Senate Bill 1615, signed by Governor Katie Hobbs in May 2025, creates a “sovereign shield” protecting Arizona State and…

North Carolina has quietly become one of the most advanced NIL states in the country. Through landmark litigation, state-backed NIL infrastructure, and early adoption of the House v. NCAA revenue-sharing…

Pennsylvania stands at a unique crossroads in the NIL revolution. Act 26 of 2021 provides the statutory foundation, while the House v. NCAA settlement drives revenue sharing at Penn State…

Tennessee stands as a primary architect of the NIL revolution. Through Senate Bill 536 and the landmark Tennessee v. NCAA antitrust lawsuit, the state constructed a “sovereign shield” that immunizes…

Virginia stands as one of the most aggressive states in asserting sovereignty over NIL governance. House Bill 1505, effective July 1, 2024, effectively nullified NCAA enforcement power within the Commonwealth—creating…

Washington State stands at a unique crossroads in the NIL revolution. Through Senate Bill 5913, the state dismantled ethics barriers that previously limited how public university employees could support NIL,…

Louisiana stands at the vanguard of NIL deregulation. Through aggressive legislation and executive action, the state has positioned itself as a “sovereign” actor in athletic commerce, stripping NCAA enforcement power…

Alabama stands at the forefront of the NIL revolution in the SEC. With powerhouse programs at the University of Alabama and Auburn University operating in a fully deregulated environment, and…